Case 4106423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106423/2023 Mr M Sim v Track Engineering Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106423/2023
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106423/2023 Mr M Sim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,720.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered £1,623.60 gross, calculated in the judgment as 90.2 hours at £18.00 per hour. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of terms and conditions and ordered £1,872.00 gross, calculated as £936.00 per week for 2 weeks.
The hearing listed for 12 January 2024 was cancelled. The judgment records no separate reasons beyond the rule 21 disposal and the monetary calculations set out above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,720.00. | Upheld | — | £1,720 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £1,623.60, calculated as 90.2 hours at £18.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,624 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions and ordered £1,872.00, calculated as £936.00 per week for 2 weeks. | Upheld | — | £1,872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,216
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.