Case 4106436/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106436/2019 Ms R Smith v Represented by: Mr R Russell Chris Law — 2020
- Case reference
- 4106436/2019
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106436/2019 Ms R Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order rather than a merits decision. It records that Ms R Smith's claim against Chris Law was withdrawn by the claimant.
On that basis, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability.
No remedy was awarded or assessed, and the judgment contains no separate determination of facts, legal issues, or compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive issues or remedy were determined. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.