Case 4106445/2023 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106445/2023 Mr B Porter v Edwards Inverurie Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106445/2023
- Decision date
- 28 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106445/2023 Mr B Porter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The judgment records that the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages. The claimant was awarded the gross sum of £119.62, calculated as 9.57 hours at £12.50 per hour.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The claimant was awarded £1,530.00 for that head of claim, calculated as 122.40 hours at £12.50 per hour.
The tribunal further directed that the respondent may deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before payment, provided those sums are remitted to HMRC and written evidence of the deductions is given to the claimant. Payment of the balance then satisfies the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as the gross sum for 9.57 hours at £12.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement calculated on the basis of 122.40 hours at £12.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,530 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.