Case 4106458/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106458/2023 Mr P Malden v Tour Skye Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106458/2023
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106458/2023 Mr P Malden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge J Hendry found that Tour Skye Ltd had unlawfully withheld wages due to Mr P Malden.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,274.00, calculated as 91 hours at £14.00 per hour. It also directed that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions if required by law, provided those sums were remitted to HMRC and the claimant was given written evidence of the deductions and remittance.
The scheduled hearing on 15 January 2024 was cancelled. The judgment records no additional claims, no separate remedy head beyond the wage award, and no reasons beyond the Rule 21 disposal on the material available.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully withheld wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,274.00, calculated as 91 hours at £14.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,274 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,274
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.