Case 4106488/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Livingstone & others as per schedule v Terry Healy Group (in Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106488/2022
- Decision date
- 11 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Livingstone & others as per schedule
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, with no response received from the respondent. The tribunal held that the claimants' complaint that the respondent had failed to comply with s.189(1)(d) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, Terry Healy Group (in Liquidation), to pay the claimants remuneration for the protected period. The judgment states that the claimants had been dismissed as redundant and that the respondent had failed to comply with the relevant statutory requirement.
The protected period was found to begin on 31 July 2022 and to last for 90 days. No monetary sum is stated in the extracted text, so no quantified award can be recorded from this judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment on no response. The tribunal held the complaint under s.189(1)(d) of TULCRA 1992 well founded and ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period to the claimants, who had been dismissed as redundant. The protected period was stated to begin on 31 July 2022 and last 90 days. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- s.189(1)(d) TULCRA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.