Case 4106546/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Davis v Souterssports Limited (in administration) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106546/2017
- Decision date
- 23 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Davis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr M Davis, brought a claim against Souterssports Limited (in administration) and that the respondent did not enter a response within the required time. On that basis, the Employment Judge considered the available material and decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim for a protective award succeeds. No further findings on the underlying facts are set out in the extracted text, and the tribunal did not determine the amount of the award in this judgment.
The remedy was left to be determined at a later hearing. The decision is therefore a liability judgment only, with no monetary figure recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for a protective award succeeds, but the amount of the remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.