Case 4106567/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Scott McCartney v Verdant Leisure Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106567/2020
- Decision date
- 4 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Scott McCartney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Open Preliminary Hearing was convened to decide whether Mr Scott McCartney had a qualifying disability for the purposes of his disability discrimination proceedings. The tribunal accepted that he had suffered from asthma since at least 2007, that the condition was acute at times, and that it had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to breathe and to carry out routine exercise. On that basis, it found that he was a disabled person within s 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of asthma.
The tribunal also considered the wrist fracture sustained on 18 December 2019 and surgery the following day. It accepted that the injury occurred, but relying on the consultant orthopaedic surgeon's report and the evidence about the duration of symptoms, it was not satisfied that the wrist impairment had a long-term effect within Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010. It therefore did not find the wrist injury, on its own, to amount to a qualifying disability. Where the claimant's account conflicted with contemporaneous medical evidence, the tribunal preferred the latter.
No determination was made as to which specific statutory claims were being pursued, and no finding was made on employer knowledge. The tribunal accepted that the respondent had fair notice that the claimant relied on asthma and a residual wrist impairment, and it reserved both parties' strike-out applications and further procedure to a later case management hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open Preliminary Hearing only. The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person under s 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of asthma, but it made no determination on the underlying statutory disability claims, employer knowledge, or remedy. The wrist-fracture impairment was not found to be a qualifying long-term impairment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Rule 41 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Chandhok and Another v Tirkey
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
- Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.