Case 4106569/2020 · Employment Tribunal
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106569/2020 Ms J McLellan v Awesome Burger Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106569/2020
- Decision date
- 20 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106569/2020 Ms J McLellan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 28 October 2020. The respondent did not enter a response within the required 28 days. The Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 determination on the available material, deciding that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The claimant's complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages and outstanding holiday pay both succeeded. The judgment states that, on the available material, the tribunal could properly determine remedy without a hearing as well, and it fixed the sums due to the claimant for each complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded this as a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,640. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded this as a complaint of outstanding holiday pay and ordered payment of £750. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,390
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.