Case 4106619/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v A Fallis (HM Inspector of Health and Safety) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106619/2024
- Decision date
- 18 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Lanarkshire
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an appeal by Lanarkshire Health Board against Ashley Fallis, HM Inspector of Health and Safety. The hearing took place in Glasgow on 19 and 22 September 2025, with the dates listed for 17 and 18 September 2025 cancelled.
After the evidence had been completed, and before the parties made submissions, the appellant withdrew the appeal. The tribunal accordingly dismissed the appeal under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The respondent reserved its position on expenses. The judgment notes the time limit in rule 75(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, which continued to apply. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits of the appeal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The appellant withdrew the appeal after completion of the evidence but before making submissions; the tribunal dismissed the appeal under rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 75(1) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.