Case 4106649/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bleakley v And others as per attached schedule Ritchies H.G.V. Training Centre Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106649/2024
- Decision date
- 18 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bleakley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response was presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in administration, but the administrator had consented to the continuation of the proceedings by letter dated 23 September 2024. The tribunal accepted that the claimants could bring the complaint because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimants were employees dismissed as redundant.
The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less. It further found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with s.188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
On that basis, the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A was well founded. The tribunal made a protective award in respect of the claimants dismissed as redundant at the respondent’s establishment at 60 Hobden Street, Glasgow, G21 4AQ. The protected period was stated to begin on 28 May 2024 and to last for 90 days. No monetary figure for the award was stated in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment on a failure to comply with ss.188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal made a protective award for the claimants dismissed as redundant; no monetary sum was stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.