Case 4106692/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106692/2020 Miss C Smith v YourLife Management Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106692/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Amanda Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4106692/2020 Miss C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Smith brought claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and discrimination on the ground of marital status against Yourlife Management Services Limited. The claimant accepted that she did not have two years' service, and the tribunal recorded that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim.
On the wages claim, the claimant later confirmed that she had been paid the outstanding sums due to her. The tribunal held that there was no basis for an unlawful deduction from wages claim and that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The respondent applied under rule 37, with an alternative application for a deposit order under rule 39, and the tribunal considered the application in chambers.
On the discrimination allegation, the claimant relied on the fact that she was legally married and was in the process of a legal separation. The tribunal found that she had not set out any facts from which it could infer that dismissal was because of her marital status, and she had not provided a comparator or facts from which a hypothetical comparator could be constructed. The tribunal noted that strike out is a draconian step, particularly for an unrepresented claimant, but concluded that the claimant had set out no facts at all capable of supporting the remaining discrimination claim.
The judgment states that the remaining claims had no reasonable prospects of success and that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant accepted that she did not have two years' service, and the tribunal recorded that it therefore had no jurisdiction to consider this claim. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant confirmed that the outstanding sums had been paid. The tribunal held there was therefore no basis for the claim and that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The claimant said she was in the process of a legal separation but was still married. The tribunal found that she had not set out any facts from which it could infer discrimination because of marital status, and she had not provided a comparator or facts from which a hypothetical comparator could be constructed. | Struck out | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 39 deposit order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.