Case 4106703/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Legal Members: P O’Hagan & S Cardownie Mr R Higgins & Others v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106703/2024
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Non
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- P O'Hagan, S Cardownie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Legal Members: P O’Hagan & S Cardownie Mr R Higgins & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants alleged breach of section 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 after the respondent implemented a 5% pay increase across UK sites following different ballot outcomes at Barony and Hexham. The tribunal found that employees at Barony did not have a contractual right to the same pay increase as Hexham employees; the harmonisation materials did not clearly displace the separate collective bargaining arrangements for the two plants.
The tribunal found that collective negotiations at Barony had reached an impasse by April 2024. It accepted that the respondent had sought further information from the Barony representatives, remained willing to discuss matters including through ACAS, and communicated directly with staff because it wanted employees to understand the rationale for the offer and because Hexham employees had accepted it.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent had shown its sole or main purpose in making the offer was not to achieve the prohibited result of bypassing collective bargaining. Its main purpose was found to be fairness across both sites in the context of a harmonised workforce. The section 145B claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Claim under section 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was dismissed. The tribunal held the respondent's sole or main purpose in making the pay offer was not to achieve the prohibited result. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 145B Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 145D Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley 2018 ICR 768
- Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley 2022 ICR 434
- Ineos Infrastructure Grangemouth Ltd v Jones 2022 IRLR 768
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.