Case 4106757/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106757/2023, 4106760/2023, 4106768/2023 & 4106776/2023 Mr J Mair v D & G Seafoods Buckie Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106757/2023
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106757/2023, 4106760/2023, 4106768/2023 & 4106776/2023 Mr J Mair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been presented, Employment Judge J M Hendry conjoined cases 4106757/2023, 4106760/2023, 4106768/2023 and 4106776/2023 and issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal awarded Mr J Mair £8,580 as pay in lieu of notice, £1,232 as accrued holiday pay, and £8,580 as a redundancy payment.
The judgment also directed that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions from those sums if required by law, and that remittance of any deductions to HMRC with written evidence would satisfy the judgment once the balance was paid. No separate reasons, legal tests, or panel members are recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Pay in lieu of notice: 19.5 x £440. | Upheld | — | £8,580 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay: 14 days x 8 x £11.00. | Upheld | — | £1,232 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment: 19.5 weeks x £440. | Upheld | — | £8,580 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.