Case 4106763/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106763/2023, 4106771/2023 & 4106779/2023 Ms L Mair v D & G Seafoods Buckie Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106763/2023
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106763/2023, 4106771/2023 & 4106779/2023 Ms L Mair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim. Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge J M Hendry conjoined cases 4106763/2023, 4106771/2023 and 4106779/2023 and issued judgment on the available material.
The tribunal awarded £880 as accrued holiday pay, described in the judgment as 2 x £440. It also awarded £880 as arrears of wages, described as 2 x 40 x £11.00.
A further £660 was awarded as a redundancy payment, described as 1.5 weeks x £440. The judgment also provided that the respondent could deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, before paying the balance to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as accrued holiday pay, stated as 2 x £440. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as arrears of wages, stated as 2 x 40 x £11.00. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment, stated as 1.5 weeks x £440. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,420
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.