Case 4106765/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106765/2023 Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry v Miss Pauline McLaren D & G Seafoods Buckie Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106765/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106765/2023 Held at Aberdeen on May 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Aberdeen recorded that the claimant, Miss Pauline McLaren, was in person and the respondent, D & G Seafoods Buckie Ltd, made no appearance and was not represented. For the reasons given orally at the hearing on 20 May 2024, the tribunal held that the claimant's claims succeeded.
The judgment then set out the sums payable. It awarded £776 as pay in lieu of notice, described as 2 x £388; £1,164.36 as accrued holiday pay, described as 3 x £388; £607.50 as arrears of wages, described as 2 x 27 x £11.25; and £582 as a redundancy payment, described as 1.5 weeks x £388. The total award recorded by the judgment is £3,129.86.
The extracted text does not set out additional written findings beyond the award headings and arithmetic. The judgment was entered on 25 July 2024 after reasons had been given orally on 20 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Awarded as a redundancy payment: 1.5 weeks x £388. | Upheld | — | £582 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as pay in lieu of notice: 2 x £388. | Upheld | — | £776 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as accrued holiday pay: 3 x £388. | Upheld | — | £1,164 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as arrears of wages: 2 x 27 x £11.25. | Upheld | — | £608 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.