Case 4106770/2023 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106770/2023 Miss R Cathcart v D & G Seafoods Buckie Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4106770/2023
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106770/2023 Miss R Cathcart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was made to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the material available. The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages, that the claimant was dismissed without notice, and that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered payment of £550 for the unauthorised deduction from wages, £275 for one week’s notice pay following dismissal without notice, and £990 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The extracted text gives no further reasoning beyond the Rule 21 default judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £550 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £550 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant was dismissed without notice and the tribunal ordered one week’s notice pay of £275. | Upheld | — | £275 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £990 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £990 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,815
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.