Case 4106806/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Cleary v Represented by Mr F Marshall - Citizens Advice Service Lillian Chillery t/a LWC Cleaning — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106806/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Cleary
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's complaint for notice pay was out of time. It found that the complaint had not been lodged within the statutory time limit and therefore dismissed it for want of jurisdiction.
The claimant's claim for statutory redundancy pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,027, recording the calculation as 3 years of service multiplied by average weekly pay of £228 over 12 weeks, with a factor of 1.5 applied in respect of years over age 41.
The respondent did not lodge a response and did not appear at the hearing. The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint for notice pay was not lodged within the statutory time limit and was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay succeeded; the respondent was ordered to pay £1,027, calculated by reference to 3 years' service and average weekly pay of £228 over 12 weeks, with a 1.5 multiplier in respect of years over age 41. | Upheld | — | £1,027 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,027
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.