Case 4106819/2019 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106819/2019 Held in Glasgow on August 2019 Mr Jim Blair v Windowscene Scotland Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106819/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona Maclean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106819/2019 Held in Glasgow on August 2019 Mr Jim Blair
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had been employed by the respondent as a Factory Manager from 22 September 2015 and was paid £715 gross, equivalent to £535 net. The respondent did not enter appearance or attend the hearing, and the claimant gave evidence. The tribunal found that on 5 March 2019 he was told he was being replaced on 11 March 2019, that he was not wanted in the factory when the new employee started, and that he would be demoted to £290 per week. On 9 March 2019 he was told to take time off because the respondent did not want to pay for not working.
Around 13 March 2019 the claimant gave one week's notice of resignation because the respondent was in fundamental breach of contract, namely by demoting him and reducing his salary. He did not receive payment for that notice week. At termination he had accrued but untaken holiday of 14.5 days, and he did not receive any payment in lieu. He found alternative employment on 25 March 2019 and the tribunal recorded an ongoing loss of £35 per week to the date of hearing.
The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It assessed the basic award at three weeks' pay using the statutory cap of £508 per week, giving £1,524. It awarded £535 for the unpaid notice week and £770 for ongoing loss, making a compensatory award of £1,305 and a total unfair dismissal award of £2,829. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Separately, the tribunal awarded £1,178 for outstanding holiday pay due but not taken on termination. Across both heads, the sums awarded totalled £4,007.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The unfair dismissal award comprised a basic award of £1,524 and a compensatory award of £1,305, including one week's net pay (£535) for unpaid notice and £770 for ongoing loss to the hearing. The reasons also note that the claimant resigned after being demoted and having his salary reduced. | Upheld | — | £2,829 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £1,178 for holidays accrued but not taken on termination, calculated as 14.5 days x £535 x 52/365. | Upheld | — | £1,178 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,007
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,524
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,305
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.