Case 4106829/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106829/2019 Mr R Rice v Represented by: Mr M Warren - Solicitor Emporium Vapour Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106829/2019
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106829/2019 Mr R Rice
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Rice brought a claim against Emporium Vapour Limited concerning an alleged failure to provide written particulars of employment under sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records the case title and representation for both parties, but it does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint.
The tribunal records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, it dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy, liability finding, or award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim concerning failure to provide written particulars of employment under sections 1 and 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed it under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.