Case 4106830/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr S Anwar v Pizza Cake Ayr Ltd t/a Domino’s Pizza — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106830/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr S Anwar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Anwar was employed by Pizza Cake Ayr Ltd from 2 December 2011 until he resigned with immediate effect on 24 September 2020. The case arose after he began working for Just Eat while on furlough from the respondent in 2020. The tribunal found that he had not told the respondent that he personally needed to shield, and that the government guidance in force did not prevent him from doing work for another employer while furloughed.
The tribunal held that several matters amounted, cumulatively, to breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence. These included the 19 June 2020 call in which Raza Hafiz told the claimant he would have to quit Just Eat or face dismissal, the manner in which David Cameron conducted the 14 July 2020 investigatory meeting, the 28 July 2020 report alleging that the claimant had behaved fraudulently and breached trust, and the subsequent disciplinary outcome on 12 August 2020 upholding those allegations and issuing a final written warning. The tribunal also found that Chris Maxfield failed to take proper account of the relevant furlough guidance and the claimant’s evidence about the different Covid risks in his work for Just Eat and for the respondent.
The claimant appealed, and on 2 September 2020 the warning and allegations were revoked. He then sought an unreserved apology. The tribunal found that the apology given on 8 September 2020 did not itself contribute to any cumulative breach, and that the respondent’s failure to respond further to the claimant’s 9 September email was an innocuous act in the circumstances. Although the claimant resigned on 24 September 2020, the tribunal held that he had acquiesced in the earlier breaches by remaining in employment after the successful appeal, continuing to receive furlough pay, and not clearly preserving any right to resign in response to the earlier conduct. The claim for constructive unfair dismissal was therefore dismissed and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant complained of constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996. The tribunal found that the respondent had breached the implied term of trust and confidence, but held that the claimant later acquiesced in those breaches and therefore was not constructively unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI SA implied term of trust and confidence
- Omilaju v Waltham Forest LBC / Kaur last straw doctrine
- acquiescence / affirmation
- Briscoe v Lubrizol Ltd
- section 27A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.