Case 4106833/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Forsyth v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106833/2024
- Decision date
- 2 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Forsyth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined at a remote hearing on 2 April 2025 that the claimant did not, in the relevant period, have the protected characteristic of disability within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.
On that basis, the claimant's Equality Act 2010 complaints, except for the complaint relying on section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, were found not well founded and dismissed. The Tribunal stated that the unfair dismissal complaint and the section 26 harassment complaint would proceed to determination at a Final Hearing.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found that the claimant did not in the relevant period have the protected characteristic of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010, so Equality Act 2010 complaints other than the section 26 harassment complaint were not well founded and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 26 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.