Case 4106841/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106841/2024 Ms A Boyce v Benvenuti (Dumbarton) Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106841/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106841/2024 Ms A Boyce
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after no response was presented by Benvenuti (Dumbarton) Ltd (in Liquidation). On the available material, Employment Judge J McCluskey determined that Ms A Boyce had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,656 gross for that breach.
The tribunal also found that Ms Boyce was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,286. No other heads of claim or remedy components were recorded in the judgment. The hearing listed for 9 January 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,656 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,656 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,286. | Upheld | — | £2,286 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,942
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.