Case 4106842/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Benjamin Elkin v Premier Security Scotland — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106842/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eleanor Mannion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Benjamin Elkin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBenjamin Elkin worked for Premier Security Scotland from 7 December 2018 as a zero-hours door supervisor and was paid monthly on or around the 16th. He resigned in October 2020 after raising repeated concerns about wage discrepancies, missing payslips and unpaid expenses. On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal held that he did not have the two years' continuous service required by s.108 ERA 1996, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed and the tribunal did not need to determine the merits of constructive dismissal.
On the contractual payment claims, the tribunal accepted the claimant's timesheets, mileage forms, payslips and bank statements and found shortfalls in wages of £1,156.39 and mileage expenses of £3,420, together with late-payment fees of £15.50 caused by payments being made after the contractual pay date in September, October and November 2020. It held that the respondent was in breach of contract and ordered payment of £4,591.89.
The tribunal rejected the £155 uniform refund claim for lack of evidence and dismissed the £60 claim relating to erroneous pay day advances. It also found that annual leave taken in the 2020 leave year had not been paid and awarded £912.02 as an unlawful deduction from wages, while claims for annual leave in 2019 were out of time. The separate statutory paternity pay claim was also out of time because the relevant payment date was 16 February 2020 and the ET1 was not lodged until 27 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service by the effective date of termination, 24 October 2020; the tribunal therefore did not need to determine the constructive dismissal issue. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Award covered wage shortfalls of £1,156.39, unpaid mileage expenses of £3,420, and late-payment fees of £15.50 caused by wages being paid after the contractual pay date. | Upheld | — | £4,592 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Annual leave taken in the 2020 leave year was unpaid, and the tribunal awarded £912.02. Claims relating to annual leave in 2019 were out of time. | Upheld | — | £912 |
| Other | Claim for a £155 uniform refund dismissed; the tribunal found no contractual entitlement on the evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for £60 in erroneous pay day advances dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Statutory paternity pay claim dismissed as out of time; the relevant payment date was 16 February 2020 and the ET1 was presented on 27 October 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,504
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 3, Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.171ZA Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.