Case 4106852/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Craig McLuskey v The Scottish Ministers — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106852/2017
- Decision date
- 24 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Craig McLuskey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination after the primary time limits had expired. He said he did not know the time limit, believed the trade union would take care of the tribunal claim after he contacted it the day after dismissal, and acted quickly once told on 31 October 2017 that the union would not support him.
The Tribunal accepted that the claimant did not know the time limit and that it was reasonable for him not to make further enquiries while he understood the union was dealing with the matter. It also accepted his evidence about the impact of his medical condition and the termination of his employment, and found this supported why he left the claim to the union.
For the unfair dismissal complaint, the Tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and that presentation on 30 November 2017, after ACAS early conciliation on 20 November 2017, was within a reasonable further period. For the disability discrimination complaint, using 2 August 2017 as the relevant date for the purposes of the hearing, the Tribunal found a delay of about four weeks would not affect the cogency of the evidence and that it was just and equitable to allow the claim to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing on time bar only. The Tribunal decided it had jurisdiction because it was not reasonably practicable to present the unfair dismissal complaint in time and it was presented within such further period as was reasonable. The merits were not determined. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing on time bar only. The Tribunal decided it would be just and equitable to allow the disability discrimination complaint to proceed. The merits were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Section 111 Employment Rights Act
- reasonably practicable
- Section 123 Equality Act
- just and equitable
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.