Case 4106855/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Gullane Gym Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4106855/2020
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Edinburgh held a hearing by CVP on 10 January 2022 before Employment Judge Rory McPherson. The respondent did not present an ET3 and did not take part in the hearing. The claimant had asked by email on 6 January 2022 for a postponement, but the tribunal refused that request by reply on 7 January 2022 and told him the hearing would proceed on 10 January 2022.
The claimant did not take part in the hearing. The tribunal record says the CVP clerk made reasonable enquiries that were practicable to try to contact him, including by the email address he had provided. In the absence of the claimant, and with no participation from the respondent, the tribunal dismissed the claim in terms of Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and no monetary award. No separate remedy findings were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment does not set out the underlying merits, but the case is listed as a redundancy matter and the claim was dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not take part at the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.