Case 4106869/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Boyle v Mark Carswell — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106869/2017
- Decision date
- 7 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not enter a response, and on the material available the Employment Judge determined remedy in favour of Miss P Boyle. The claimant's complaints of redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages all succeeded.
The tribunal awarded statutory redundancy pay of £1,562.85. That figure was calculated using the claimant's date of birth of 24 March 1966, her employment dates of 1 May 2013 to 31 July 2017, average weekly hours of 34.73 and a gross hourly rate of £7.50.
Notice pay was awarded at £884, calculated from a net weekly salary of £221 and four complete years of service. Holiday pay was awarded at £221, described as one week's net wages. Unpaid wages were awarded at £196.88 for 26.25 hours worked but unpaid at £7.50 per hour. The total award was £2,864.73.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,563 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded at £221 net weekly salary for four complete years' service. | Upheld | — | £884 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded for one week's net wages. | Upheld | — | £221 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages awarded for 26.25 hours at £7.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £197 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,865
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.