Case 4106876/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wilson v Geopost UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106876/2014
- Decision date
- 19 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Wilson's claim against Geopost UK Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not identify the substantive legal label of the claim, only that it was the claim in case 4106876/2014.
On 22 December 2020 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 January 2021, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons record that the claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why strike out should not be made and did not request a hearing.
In those circumstances, Employment Judge Robert Gall ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment dated 18 January 2021 was sent to the parties on 19 January 2021. No monetary award was made and no remedy assessment is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.