Case 4106891/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106891/2017 & 4107544/17 Held in Edinburgh Employment Judge d'Inverno Mr C Duffy v Represented by: Unrepresented Smart Property Management And Lettings Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106891/2017
- Decision date
- 25 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J D’Inverno Date
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106891/2017 & 4107544/17 Held in Edinburgh Employment Judge d'Inverno Mr C Duffy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 31 January 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to provide written reasons by 8 February 2019 explaining why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that issue. The claimants did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge D’Inverno therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.