Case 4106894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Tumblety v Ivanhoe Caledonian Printing Company Limited (in Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106894/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Tumblety
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued judgment under Rule 21 on the available material because no response had been presented within the applicable time limit. The respondent was in compulsory liquidation, but the relevant court had granted permission for the continuation of the proceedings on 28 March 2023. The judge accepted that the claimant could bring the complaint because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimant had been dismissed as redundant.
The tribunal held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It found that the respondent had dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, had failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A, and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188. The tribunal therefore made a protective award in respect of the claimant as an employee dismissed as redundant at the respondent's Riverside Works, Eskmills, Musselburgh premises.
The judgment states that the protected period began on 1 August 2022 and lasted for 90 days. The extract does not state a monetary sum for the award, so no total figure is recorded here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 arising from a failure to consult collectively on redundancies. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.