Case 4106912/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106912/2019 Mr G Jenkins v Markinch Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106912/2019
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106912/2019 Mr G Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent प्रस्तुत no response to the claim, and Employment Judge Robert Gall issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in April 2019.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,192.30 and a further sum recorded in the extracted text as £2.192.80 for unpaid wages in April 2019. Read with the first figure, the total ordered is £4,385.10.
The hearing listed for 26 July 2019 was cancelled. No other claims, legal tests, or lay members are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The extracted text records a payment of £2,192.30 and a further sum written as £2.192.80 for unpaid wages in April 2019; this appears to be an OCR formatting issue and is treated as £2,192.80 for extraction purposes. | Upheld | — | £4,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,385
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.