Case 4106914/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Povse v Innseagan House Hotel Limited and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106914/2017
- Decision date
- 11 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr I Povse
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary issue on time bar. The claimant’s ET1, presented on 8 December 2017, advanced claims of automatically unfair dismissal for protected disclosure and/or asserting a statutory right, unauthorised deductions from wages / national minimum wage, unpaid accrued annual leave, failure to provide a written statement of particulars, and failure to provide itemised pay statements. The relevant limitation periods were the normal three-month time limits, subject to ACAS early conciliation and any statutory exceptions.
The central factual issue was the effective date of termination. The claimant said his employment ended on 25 July 2017. The respondents said it ended on 17 July 2017. The tribunal preferred the respondents’ evidence, describing it as clear, consistent and corroborated, whereas the claimant’s account was inconsistent and contradicted by his earlier email of 1 February 2018, in which he stated that termination of employment was on 17 July 2017. The tribunal found that he probably gave a week’s notice between 13 and 15 July 2017, left the site on 17 July 2017, and on that date indicated by his conduct that he resigned with immediate effect.
On that basis, time began to run on 17 July 2017 for all claims. The ACAS early conciliation notification was started on 19 October 2017, more than three months later, so it did not extend the limitation period. The tribunal also found that the last deduction in any series, and the latest date on which any payment for untaken annual leave should have been made, was 17 July 2017. Because the claim form was not presented until 8 December 2017 and the claimant did not argue that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims in time, all claims were dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Automatically unfair dismissal claim based on protected disclosure and/or asserting a statutory right; dismissed at preliminary hearing as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deductions / pay below the national minimum wage; dismissed at preliminary hearing as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave at termination; dismissed at preliminary hearing as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment under s.1 ERA 1996; dismissed at preliminary hearing as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements under s.8 ERA 1996; dismissed at preliminary hearing as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- three-month limitation period
- ACAS early conciliation extension
- s.207B(3) ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- s.111 ERA 1996
- regulation 30 WTR 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.