Case 4106914/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106914/2023 (V) Held at Glasgow on January 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr Craig Kennedy v Represented by: Mrs L Kennedy - Partner The Vineyard Group Ltd t/a The Auld Inn — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106914/2023
- Decision date
- 5 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106914/2023 (V) Held at Glasgow on January 2024 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr Craig Kennedy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, for the reasons given orally at the hearing on 22 January 2024, found that Mr Craig Kennedy's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded against The Vineyard Group Ltd t/a The Auld Inn. The respondent was not present and was not represented at the hearing.
The tribunal ordered the respondent company to pay the claimant £1,442 as unpaid wages. The judgment records that payment may be satisfied by payment of this sum under deduction of PAYE tax, provided vouching is supplied showing the tax deducted.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded and awarded unpaid wages of £1,442. Payment may be satisfied under deduction of PAYE tax if vouching is supplied showing the tax deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,442 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,442
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.