Case 4106915/2017 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106915/2017 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on October 2018 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Kathleen Dykes v Whitbread Group plc — 2018
- Case reference
- 4106915/2017
- Decision date
- 26 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod Judgment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106915/2017 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on October 2018 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Kathleen Dykes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the respondent's application to strike out the claim because the claimant had not complied with an order dated 21 June 2018 requiring information relevant to disability status and the substance of the claim. The respondent submitted that the claimant had not engaged with the Tribunal process, that the claim was not in a triable state, and that the delay and non-compliance justified strike out.
The claimant accepted that she had not complied with the order but relied on medical and personal circumstances, including pregnancy-related illness, the birth of her child by emergency caesarean section, and ongoing mental health support connected with bipolar disorder and risk of post-partum psychosis. The Tribunal accepted that the claimant was in default and that the default was serious, but was not persuaded that she had deliberately defied the order.
The Tribunal found that the claimant's default had been caused in large part by her personal and health circumstances and that it had not been shown that a fair trial was no longer possible or that clear prejudice had been caused to the respondent. The strike out application was refused, but the order was reissued as an Unless Order requiring compliance by 11 January 2019, failing which the claim would be dismissed automatically.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary Hearing judgment only determined the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37; the substantive claims were not adjudicated. The strike out application was refused, and the 21 June 2018 order was reissued as an Unless Order. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 37(1)(b) and (c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Weir Valves & Controls (UK) Ltd v Armitage [2004] ICR 371
- Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James 2006 IRLR 630 CA
- Khan v London Borough of Barnet UKEAT/0002/18
- overriding objective
- whether a fair trial is still possible
- proportionate response
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.