Case 4106916/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Juliet Weir v Tweedie & Marshall Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106916/2023
- Decision date
- 16 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Juliet Weir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs Juliet Weir’s claim for a redundancy payment was well founded. The judgment records that the case was heard via CVP in Glasgow on 12 February 2024 before Employment Judge O’Dempsey, and that the claimant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by its director, Mr C Graham.
The tribunal awarded the statutory redundancy sum of £6,544.00. The written record states that this figure was calculated by reference to the claimant being 49 at the date of dismissal and having gross weekly pay of £409.00 at that time.
No other claims or remedies are set out in the written judgment excerpt, and no separate split of the award is provided beyond the statutory redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claim for a redundancy payment was well founded and ordered payment of the statutory sum of £6,544.00, based on the claimant being 49 at the date of dismissal and having gross weekly pay of £409.00. | Upheld | — | £6,544 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,544
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.