Case 4106922/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C McGregor v D Steven & Son Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106922/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C McGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C McGregor worked for D Steven & Son Ltd as an LGV driver from 10 October 2016. The tribunal found that by 1 October 2023 he had been moved onto yard duties at Bellshill with a 35-hour limit, which reduced his income by about 30 to 40%. It accepted his evidence that he had not been told clearly why this change was being made, and it found that the internal email to the depot saying the change was due to low volumes was untrue.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had been off work with a kidney infection and essential hypertension and had repeatedly asked when he could return to driving. It found that the respondent did not give him a meaningful explanation that its position was that he needed to notify DVLA before driving again, and it noted that no occupational health or GP advice was sought to confirm the extent of the condition. When the claimant raised a grievance on 16 October 2023 about the lack of communication, the restricted hours, the loss of his dedicated vehicle and the effect on his earnings, the respondent acknowledged the grievance but did not arrange a meeting or otherwise engage with the substance of the complaint.
Applying s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996 and the authorities it cited on constructive dismissal, including the implied term of trust and confidence and the last straw principle, the tribunal held that the respondent's conduct cumulatively amounted to a repudiatory breach. It found that the claimant resigned because of that conduct and that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal also found that there was no continuing loss because the claimant obtained new employment quickly.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,969, calculated from seven full years of service and a gross average weekly wage of £567. It also awarded £600 for loss of statutory rights. The total award was £4,569.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The ET1 pleaded that the claimant had been unfairly constructively dismissed; the tribunal analysed the case under s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996 and recorded the successful claim as unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £4,569 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,569
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,969
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v BCCI SA
- BG Plc v O'Brien
- Woods v W M Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd
- Buckland v Bournemouth University
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.