Case 4106950/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106950/2019 Mr N Mughal v MNKWB Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106950/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106950/2019 Mr N Mughal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Muriel Robison recorded that the claimant, Mr N Mughal, had succeeded in his complaints of unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment identifies MNKWB Ltd as the respondent. The decision is limited to liability and does not set out the underlying factual reasons for the findings in the extracted text provided.
The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later hearing. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided, and no breakdown of basic award, compensatory award, interest, or other sums appears in the extraction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint succeeded; remedy was to be determined at a hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint succeeded; remedy was to be determined at a hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.