Case 4106952/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106952/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on January 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr Michel Da Costa v Rainbow Cars Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106952/2023
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106952/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on January 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr Michel Da Costa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Aberdeen on 25 January 2024, Employment Judge N M Hosie heard the case of Mr Michel Da Costa against Rainbow Cars Ltd. The written judgment dated 29 January 2024 states that, for the reasons given orally at the hearing, the claim was dismissed.
The extract reproduced here does not set out those oral reasons, does not separate findings by head of claim, and does not record any monetary award. On the case listing supplied for this matter, the pleaded categories were unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but the written judgment itself records only the overall dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records only a global dismissal and does not separately set out findings on this head; this classification follows the case listing categories supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment records only a global dismissal and does not separately set out findings on this head; this classification follows the case listing categories supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.