Case 4106955/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Hargan & others v P.M. Ltd (In Administration) st — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106955/2024
- Decision date
- 31 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Hargan & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 22. The Tribunal recorded that no response was presented within the applicable time limit and that the respondent was in administration, with the administrator consenting to the claims proceeding on 14 July 2025.
The Tribunal found that the claim concerned a failure by the respondent to comply with its duties under section 188 and section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It held that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because there was no recognised trade union for collective bargaining purposes.
The Tribunal found that the complaint was well founded. It found that the respondent dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, and that it failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with s.188A and then consulted in accordance with s.188.
The Tribunal made a protective award in respect of employees dismissed as redundant by the respondent at its site at 38 Queen Street, Glasgow, G1 3DX. The protected period was stated to begin on 31 July 2025 and to last for 90 days. No monetary figure for the award was set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under s.188 and s.188A TULRCA 1992 for failure to inform and consult about proposed redundancies; no monetary amount was stated in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.