Case 4106960/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Daly (Deceased) v Represented by . Mr R Lawson Solicitor McTear Contract Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4106960/2017
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Daly (Deceased)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 16 May 2023, Employment Judge M Robison held that Mr R Daly was unfairly dismissed. The judgment was issued by consent under rule 64 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal also held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and fixed that payment at £2,934. In addition, it found that he was entitled to notice pay, but the amount of that entitlement was not determined in the judgment.
The tribunal listed a further CVP hearing for 20 July 2023 to determine the remedy for unfair dismissal and failure to pay notice pay. That later hearing was also listed to determine liability and remedy in relation to the claims of arrears of pay and holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment in the sum of £2,934. | Upheld | — | £2,934 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records entitlement to notice pay but does not specify the amount; remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.