Case 4106965/2019 · Employment Tribunal
“D” v Greater Glasgow Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106965/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
“D”
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Greater Glasgow Health Board. The judgment records claims for breach of contract/unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of notice pay, and for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The Tribunal dismissed those claims following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any adjudication on the merits, remedy award, named legal test, or lay panel members.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract/unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of notice pay, dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract/unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of notice pay, dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.