Case 4106969/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D O’Donnell v Poppy Maxwell Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4106969/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D O’Donnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for holiday pay only, arising from about six months' work for Poppy Maxwell Ltd as a barista and later barista supervisor in central Glasgow. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and from the respondent's director, Mr Curtis. It found that the claimant was paid £10.50 per hour, later £11.50 per hour, took one day's annual leave in August amounting to 10 hours, and left employment on 29 September 2023. Where the ET3 figures and the pay slips differed, the tribunal used the pay slip hours, and it treated the "net" hours as the correct hours because they excluded unpaid breaks.
Applying the Working Time Regulations 1998 and Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21, the tribunal calculated holiday pay by reference to the claimant's average weekly pay under ss.221-224 ERA 1996. Because the claimant had no normal working hours, it used s.224. On the tribunal's findings, he had worked 25 weeks, giving a pro-rated entitlement of 2.7 weeks' holiday; after deducting the 10 hours of leave already taken, 2.44 weeks remained unpaid.
Multiplying 2.44 weeks by the claimant's average gross weekly pay of £420.75 produced £1,026.63 gross holiday pay due. The tribunal found the respondent had already paid £850 gross on 13 October 2023 and a further £201.50 gross on 1 December 2023, making £1,051.50 gross in total. As that exceeded the amount found due, the tribunal held that the claimant had been paid all outstanding sums on termination and dismissed the holiday pay claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The reasons contain an apparent typographical inconsistency stating that employment commenced on 6 April 2024, but the rest of the chronology in the judgment is in 2023. The tribunal determined the holiday pay claim only and found no further sum due on termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A and 14
- Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21
- ss.221-224 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.