Case 4106976/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Janke v Represented by: Ms L Simpson - Govanhill Law Centre Nasz Sklep Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 4106976/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge B Campbell determined, at a hearing held via Cloud Video Platform on 25 January 2021, that by virtue of section 188(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Secretary of State was to pay the claimant £166.68. The sum was identified as the net value of the claimant's accrued annual leave for 2018, which the tribunal said she was entitled to under section 184(1)(c) of the Act.
No other substantive claims or issues are set out in the extracted judgment text. The decision records only the award for accrued annual leave and does not separate any additional heads of loss or make any further findings about liability beyond the statutory entitlement referenced in the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal ordered the Secretary of State to pay £166.68 under section 188(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of the net value of the claimant's accrued annual leave for 2018, to which she was entitled under section 184(1)(c). | Upheld | — | £167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £167
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 184(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.