Case 4106980/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 4106980/2023 Mr I Morrison v SANDSTONE UK PROPERTY INVESTMENT Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4106980/2023
- Decision date
- 25 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 4106980/2023 Mr I Morrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr I Morrison’s claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and the claimant had been told on 21 November 2023 that he needed to apply to the court for permission to proceed, but he was unable to obtain that consent.
On 23 July 2025 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 20 August 2025, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal struck out the claim on 25 August 2025. The judgment does not record any merits determination or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued; no merits findings were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Protective award head of claim (the taxonomy has no dedicated protective-award type). It was struck out with the rest of the claim under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued; no merits findings were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued; no merits findings were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued; no merits findings were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.