Case 4106981/2019 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106981/2019 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on October 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Raffaele Grasso v Represented by Ms R Mohamed Solicitor John McMenamin Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4106981/2019
- Decision date
- 21 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4106981/2019 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on October 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Raffaele Grasso
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 17 October 2019, Employment Judge Macleod considered whether the claimant's claims were out of time. The claimant said he had been unfairly dismissed and unlawfully deprived of contractual payments on termination. The respondent initially argued that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction because of the way the claim had been presented.
The evidence showed that the claim had first been attempted in May 2019 and again in June 2019, but the tribunal rejected it because the correct early conciliation number had not been provided and because the respondent's name on the claim form did not match the early conciliation certificate. The later documents showed that ACAS had issued an early conciliation certificate on 18 April 2019 and that the discrepancy in the respondent's name was a typographical error.
The judge held that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented within the statutory timescale because of that confusion, and that the claim was then presented within such further time as was reasonable. He said it was in the interests of justice to allow the claim to proceed because the error was outside the claimant's control. The respondent's representative accepted that the time-bar argument should not be insisted upon, and the case was allowed to proceed to a full hearing on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing on time bar and jurisdiction only; the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim could proceed to a full hearing on the merits after finding the delayed presentation was caused by ECC and respondent-name confusion outside the claimant's control. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Preliminary hearing on time bar and jurisdiction only; the tribunal held that the claim about contractual payments on termination could proceed to a full hearing on the merits after treating the ECC mismatch as a typographical error outside the claimant's control. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable in all the circumstances
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.