Case 4107007/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr J Henderson v Eros Retail Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107007/2020
- Decision date
- 30 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr J Henderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Henderson was employed by Eros Retail Ltd as a Retail Assistant from 30 March to 22 November 2020. His contract stated a minimum of 4 hours per week, but in practice he usually worked around 30 hours per week and the tribunal found that hours beyond the minimum were not treated as overtime. The tribunal held that he did not have normal working hours for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so holiday pay fell to be calculated by reference to average weekly remuneration under section 224 ERA 1996 as modified by the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The claim concerned holiday pay for one week of annual leave taken from 31 August to 6 September 2020. The respondent calculated gross holiday pay at £130.80, apparently on an assumed 15-hour week, and did not reconsider the calculation when the claimant raised concerns. Because payslips were not available for the earlier part of the employment, the tribunal adopted a broad brush approach and assessed the claimant's average gross weekly pay over the 23 complete weeks immediately before the holiday at £258.12.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had underpaid holiday pay by £127.32 gross. It therefore upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 and ordered the respondent to pay £127.32 gross. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or additional heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay for annual leave taken from 31 August to 6 September 2020 was underpaid; the tribunal found a gross shortfall of £127.32. | Upheld | — | £127 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £127
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 224 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 234 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.