Case 4107008/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107008/2015 & Others Mr D Bergiel & Others v Galliford Try Employment Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107008/2015
- Decision date
- 11 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107008/2015 & Others Mr D Bergiel & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records multiple claims brought by Mr D Bergiel and others against Galliford Try Employment Limited, with a schedule listing related case numbers and claimant names. The substantive allegations are not described in the judgment text.
Employment Judge Robert Gall dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimants had withdrawn them. No remedy or monetary award was made or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims, having been withdrawn by the claimants, are dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself does not set out the substantive working time allegations. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.