Case 4107036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107036/2020 Mr I Watson v Pride Commercial Interiors — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107036/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107036/2020 Mr I Watson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Robert Gall found that Mr I Watson had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The judgment records the calculation basis for the payment as the claimant's age of 48 years, six years' service, and a gross weekly wage of £538, subject to the statutory maximum. The resulting redundancy payment awarded was £4,842.
The listed hearing on 22 March 2021 was cancelled. No other claims, findings, or remedies are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Issued under rule 21 on the available material. The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment calculated using age 48, six years' service, and a gross weekly wage of £538, capped at the statutory maximum. | Upheld | — | £4,842 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,842
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.