Case 4107041/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Nimmo v Galliford Try Employment Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107041/2015
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Nimmo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 5 February 2020 the claimant was given until 19 February 2020 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that issue. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the underlying wage allegations; this classification follows the listed case category, while the tribunal's stated decision was to strike out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out the underlying working time allegations; this classification follows the listed case category, while the tribunal's stated decision was to strike out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.