Case 4107043/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107043/2019 Mr G J Bird v East Calder And District Homing Society And Social Club — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107043/2019
- Decision date
- 23 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Muriel Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107043/2019 Mr G J Bird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Muriel Robison issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. The claimant, Mr G J Bird, succeeded in his breach of contract claim in respect of notice, and the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £3,517.20.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,465.00. The hearing listed for 9 August 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,517.20. | Upheld | — | £3,517 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £1,465.00. | Upheld | — | £1,465 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,982
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.