Case 4107057/2019 · Employment Tribunal
462 Default judgment Scotland EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107057/2019 Mr David Benton v Bryan Byrne Consultants Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107057/2019
- Decision date
- 17 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
462 Default judgment Scotland EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107057/2019 Mr David Benton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 default judgment, issued because no response had been presented. Employment Judge Ian McPherson decided the case on the available material, including the claimant's additional information provided on 10 July 2019.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for March 2019. It ordered payment of £2,250 for unpaid salary and £23.40 for unpaid expenses. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,673.07, calculated as 9 weeks' notice pay at £519.23 per week. The higher claim for £6,750, said to represent 3 months at £2,250 per month, was refused because it was not vouched as contractually payable.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £6,858. That figure was based on the claimant's age of 56, 9 years' continuous employment, and weekly pay of £519.23, but restricted to the statutory maximum weekly amount of £508, producing an entitlement of 13.5 weeks at the capped rate. The claimant's higher redundancy claim of £13,780 was refused as overstated and not vouched as contractually payable.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,290, calculated as 8.6 days at £150 per day. A separate claim for £500 for loss of statutory rights was refused because there was no complaint of unfair dismissal before the tribunal. The hearing listed for 9 August 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for March 2019 and ordered payment of £2,250 unpaid salary plus £23.40 unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £2,273 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded 9 weeks' notice pay. The claim for £6,750, said to be 3 months at £2,250 per month, was refused as not vouched as contractually payable. | Upheld | — | £4,673 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £6,858 based on age 56, 9 years' continuous employment, and weekly pay subject to the statutory cap. The larger claim for £13,780 was refused as overstated and not vouched as contractually payable. | Upheld | — | £6,858 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and awarded £1,290, being 8.6 days at £150 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,290 |
| Other | The claim for £500 for loss of statutory rights was refused because there was no complaint of unfair dismissal before the tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,094
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.